I should explain that I expected that these would be mostly walled gardens with each social networking service offering it's unique and special approach to the broadcast communication issue. As more of these services have started integrating, using back door API's and making it a giant collective, that while my single voice is not important, it adds to a logarithm of what is the collective whole.
I am not foolish, I don't think that my posting the command to decrypt what I post keeps my messages "secure", and that is not my intention for them. What I do hope to succeed in is that my messages aren't being grokked for the commercial, financial and statistical benifit of corporate entities for whom I hold no allegiance, holding or care. It's mine, and I made it for public consumption. As I see venture capitalist investing millions of dollars in companies who scrub what is the internet collective for profit and gain, I am saddened. I would understand if doing this created a benefit for the consumer or the internet as a whole.
My goal is to allow me, my family and my friends to continue using the tools as they were originally designed without offering my portion of mind-share away. I feel that, especially in the case of the base64 posts, I achieve the goals of:
- communicating with family and friends with miniumum tech overhead.
- make it easy for someone to ignore me on a broadcast stream.
- upset the machines on the far side of the services I use from gaining profit over my ideas and opinions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.